ブログ

Assume That after the Contract Was Signed That Zehmer

2022年1月3日

Assuming that after the contract was signed, that Zehmer had no intention of selling his farm to Lucy, would the contract still be valid? This question has been at the center of many legal debates in contract law.

The case of Lucy v. Zehmer is one of the most famous contract law cases in the US. In this case, Lucy had offered to buy Zehmer`s farm for $50,000. After some negotiations, the two parties agreed to a deal and signed a contract. However, Zehmer later claimed that he had no intention of selling the farm and had only signed the contract as a joke.

In court, Lucy argued that the contract was valid as both parties had agreed to it and signed it. On the other hand, Zehmer claimed that he had not intended to enter into a legally binding agreement. The court ultimately ruled in favor of Lucy, stating that the contract was enforceable as both parties had demonstrated an intention to enter into a binding agreement.

This case highlights the importance of intention in contract law. A contract is only enforceable if both parties have come to a mutual agreement and have demonstrated the intention to enter into a legally binding agreement. If one party can prove that they did not intend to enter into such an agreement, then the contract may not be valid.

In the case of Lucy v. Zehmer, the court found that Zehmer had demonstrated an intention to enter into a binding agreement by negotiating the terms of the contract and signing it. Even if Zehmer claimed later that he had no intention of selling the farm, his actions and words had already demonstrated otherwise.

In conclusion, assuming that after the contract was signed, that Zehmer had no intention of selling his farm to Lucy, it would not necessarily invalidate the contract. The court would consider the intention of both parties at the time the contract was signed and determine whether a legally binding agreement had been made. As a professional, it is important to be aware of legal cases such as Lucy v. Zehmer and to understand the impact of intention in contract law.